When an individual suffers an injury due to the negligence of a government agency or employee, pursuing compensation can be significantly more complicated than filing a claim against a private party. This is because the legal doctrine of sovereign immunity restricts lawsuits against the government in many circumstances. However, exceptions to this rule do exist, and understanding how they apply is key to protecting your rights.

What Is Sovereign Immunity?

Sovereign immunity is a legal principle that dates back centuries, originally shielding kings and rulers from being sued without their consent. In modern U.S. law, this concept still applies to federal, state, and local governments, providing them with broad protection against lawsuits.

At its core, sovereign immunity prevents individuals from suing the government unless the government has specifically waived that immunity. This doctrine recognizes the government’s unique role in society and is intended to protect public resources and decision-making from constant litigation.

However, this protection is not absolute. In many cases, both federal and state governments have enacted laws that waive sovereign immunity under specific conditions, allowing injured parties to seek compensation for certain types of harm.

How the Federal Tort Claims Act Works

At the federal level, the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) provides one of the most significant waivers of sovereign immunity. Passed in 1946, the FTCA allows private citizens to sue the United States for most injuries caused by the negligent or wrongful acts of federal employees acting within the scope of their employment.

Some important points about FTCA claims:

• Strict procedural requirements: Before filing a lawsuit, the injured party must submit an administrative claim to the relevant federal agency and wait for a response.
• Limited damages: Punitive damages are not allowed under the FTCA; only compensatory damages can be awarded.
• Limited exceptions: Certain types of claims—such as those involving discretionary government functions—remain barred under the FTCA.

State-Level Sovereign Immunity and Tort Claims Acts

Each state maintains its own version of sovereign immunity and its own process for allowing—or disallowing—lawsuits against the state or its subdivisions (such as municipalities or school districts).

Most states have enacted some form of a state tort claims act, which establishes guidelines for when a person can sue the state government for personal injury or property damage. However, these laws vary widely from one state to another.

Key variables in state tort claims acts often include:

• Types of claims allowed (for example, motor vehicle accidents caused by state employees)
• Damage caps (limiting the amount of compensation a claimant can receive)
• Notice requirements (requiring that a claim be filed within a short time after the injury—often far shorter than the standard personal injury statute of limitations)
• Immunities retained (for instance, some states continue to bar suits related to certain emergency response activities)

If you are considering suing a state or local government, it is vital to understand your state’s specific rules—missing a notice deadline or filing a claim outside the scope of the waiver can cause your case to be dismissed entirely.

Common Scenarios Where Governments Can Be Held Liable

While many government functions are protected by sovereign immunity, there are common situations where the government may be liable for personal injury:

• Motor vehicle accidents involving government vehicles
• Dangerous public property, such as poorly maintained roads, sidewalks, or public buildings
• Negligent maintenance of public parks, recreational facilities, or transit systems
• Medical malpractice at state-run hospitals or clinics
• Negligent actions of government employees acting within their employment duties

Even when the state permits such claims, damage caps or procedural hurdles may significantly limit the compensation available.

The Challenge of Damage Caps on Public Entity Claims

One of the most controversial aspects of government liability laws is the widespread use of damage caps. Many states place strict limits on the total amount of compensation an injured person can recover in a lawsuit against the state or local government—even if a jury would have awarded more in a private case.

For example, some states limit non-economic damages (such as pain and suffering) to as little as $100,000 or $200,000 in claims against the government. Others cap total damages—both economic and non-economic—at a fixed amount.

These caps are often justified by governments as necessary to protect public budgets, but they can leave severely injured victims with compensation that falls well short of their actual needs.

Navigating Procedural Traps When Suing a Government Entity

One of the most common ways that government entities avoid liability is by using the strict procedural requirements imposed by tort claims acts. These traps for the unwary can derail even strong cases if the claimant does not follow them precisely.

Some of the most common pitfalls include:

• Failing to file a timely notice of claim (sometimes required within 60 to 180 days of the injury)
• Filing the claim with the wrong government entity or department
• Omitting required information in the notice
• Attempting to bypass the administrative claims process and filing a lawsuit too soon

Working with an experienced attorney familiar with government liability cases can help ensure that all procedural requirements are met and maximize the chances of success.

The Importance of Legal Representation For Personal Injury Claims Involving a Public Entity

Lawsuits against government entities are inherently more complex than standard personal injury cases. Between sovereign immunity, procedural hurdles, and damage caps, injured parties face an uphill battle when trying to hold a government accountable.

Skilled legal representation is essential in these cases. An attorney who understands the relevant laws and knows how to navigate the administrative process can make the difference between a dismissed claim and a successful recovery.

Furthermore, a knowledgeable lawyer can help explore creative avenues for compensation—for example, by identifying whether third-party contractors (who may not be protected by sovereign immunity) also bear some responsibility for the injury.

Conclusion

Sovereign immunity creates significant challenges for anyone seeking to sue a government entity for personal injury. While federal and state laws do allow certain claims to proceed, strict procedural rules and damage caps make these cases far from straightforward.

If you or a loved one has been injured by the actions of a government agency or employee, seeking experienced legal counsel is one of the most important steps you can take. Navigating the complexities of sovereign immunity requires both legal expertise and strategic thinking—and without it, even valid claims may go unaddressed.

Need Legal Help? Brandon J. Broderick, Attorney at Law is One Phone Call Away

Navigating Personal Injury Claims can be challenging. Fortunately, you don't need to do it alone. The experienced lawyers at Brandon J. Broderick, Attorney at Law, are available 24/7 to help you understand your legal options, gather necessary evidence, and build a strong case to secure the settlement you deserve.

Contact us now for a free legal review.