When a patient suffers harm due to medical negligence, determining who is legally responsible—hospital or doctor—can significantly affect the outcome of a malpractice claim. Medical errors cause an estimated 250,000 deaths per year in the United States, making them the third leading cause of death. Victims and their families often face complex decisions about whom to hold accountable. This article breaks down the key differences between hospital and doctor liability and explains what factors determine who you can sue.

Hospital Liability in Medical Malpractice Cases

Hospitals can be held liable for medical malpractice under several circumstances. The legal doctrine of vicarious liability—which holds employers accountable for the actions of their employees—commonly applies to hospital staff such as nurses, technicians, and physician employees.

Situations where a hospital may be liable include:

• Negligent hiring or retention: If a hospital hires a medical professional it should have known was unqualified, or retains an employee with a record of poor performance or misconduct.
• Inadequate training or supervision: Hospitals must provide proper training and oversight to staff members. Failure to do so can lead to liability.
• Systemic failures: Poor recordkeeping, understaffing, faulty equipment, or disorganized communication among departments may contribute to malpractice.
• Employee negligence: If a nurse administers the wrong medication or a technician mishandles equipment, the hospital can be sued directly.

Hospitals typically carry extensive liability insurance to cover these risks, making them an important target for a malpractice claim when systemic issues or staff errors are involved.

Doctor Liability in Medical Malpractice Cases

In contrast, doctors are often independent contractors rather than hospital employees. This distinction matters because hospitals are generally not liable for the actions of non-employee physicians unless the hospital contributed to the harm in some way—such as granting privileges to an unqualified doctor.

Doctors can be sued individually for malpractice based on their own negligent acts or omissions, including:

• Misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis
• Surgical errors
• Improper treatment
• Failure to obtain informed consent
• Poor follow-up care

Physicians usually carry their own malpractice insurance policies, which are used to compensate patients in successful claims.

Provider Employment Status: Why It Matters in Medical Malpractice Claims

The employment status of the healthcare provider is a pivotal factor in determining liability. In many cases, a doctor working in a hospital may not technically be an employee. This means the hospital may avoid direct liability for that doctor’s mistakes, even though the incident occurred within the hospital walls.

Key employment distinctions:

• Employees: Nurses, medical residents, and some in-house doctors are hospital employees. The hospital is generally liable for their malpractice.
• Independent contractors: Many attending physicians, surgeons, and specialists have privileges at the hospital but are not employees. In these cases, patients must sue the doctor individually unless the hospital was negligent in granting privileges or managing them.

However, courts increasingly examine whether hospitals’ advertising and representations gave patients the impression that the doctor was part of the hospital staff, even if legally independent. This is known as "apparent agency" or "ostensible agency" and can open the door for hospital liability.

Shared Liability: When Both Hospital and Doctor Are Sued

In some cases, both the hospital and the doctor may share liability for a patient’s injury. For example:

• A surgeon (independent contractor) commits an error during surgery, but a nurse’s negligence in monitoring post-op complications worsens the outcome.
• A hospital credentialed a doctor despite known concerns about their competency, making both the hospital and the doctor liable.

Joint liability scenarios typically lead to more complex litigation but also increase the likelihood of adequate compensation for the injured patient.

Determining Whom to Sue For Medical Malpractice: Key Factors

Victims of medical malpractice—and their attorneys—must carefully analyze several factors to decide whom to sue:

• Nature of the negligence: Was the harm caused by an individual practitioner’s actions or by broader hospital system failures?
• Employment status: Is the provider an employee or independent contractor?
• Hospital’s role: Did the hospital fail in its duty to supervise, credential, or manage staff appropriately?
• Potential damages: Does the potential defendant have adequate insurance or assets to satisfy a judgment?

Statute of Limitations and Other Legal Considerations in Medical Malpractice Claims

Every state imposes time limits, called statutes of limitations, for filing medical malpractice claims. These deadlines often range from one to three years from the date of injury or discovery of harm. Missing this window can prevent victims from pursuing any claim at all.

Additionally, some states cap the amount of non-economic damages (such as pain and suffering) recoverable in malpractice cases. Understanding these limits is vital when evaluating potential claims against hospitals or doctors.

Steps to Take if You Suspect Medical Malpractice

If you or a loved one has been harmed by potential medical malpractice:

• Request complete medical records: These are key to evaluating whether a breach of care occurred.
• Consult an experienced attorney: Determining who is liable and building a strong case requires legal expertise.
• Act promptly: Don’t wait to pursue legal advice, as deadlines can be strict and critical evidence may be lost over time.

Conclusion

Deciding whether to sue a hospital, a doctor, or both after a medical error involves a nuanced analysis of employment relationships, the nature of the negligence, and state laws. In many cases, both entities play a role in providing patient care, and both may bear responsibility when things go wrong. A well-prepared legal strategy can help victims pursue the compensation they deserve while navigating the complicated world of medical malpractice liability.

Need Legal Help? Brandon J. Broderick, Attorney at Law is One Phone Call Away

Navigating medical malpractice claims can be challenging. Fortunately, you don't need to do it alone. The experienced lawyers at Brandon J. Broderick, Attorney at Law, are available 24/7 to help you understand your legal options, gather necessary evidence, and build a strong case to secure the settlement you deserve.

Contact us now for a free legal review.