Losing a loved one is disorienting in ways people do not expect. Beyond the grief, there is often a sudden and frightening financial gap. Bills still arrive. Mortgages, tuition, and everyday expenses do not pause simply because a family has been shattered. In Vermont wrongful death cases, one of the most significant and contested parts of a claim is proving lost income. Families are frequently surprised by how technical and adversarial this process can become, especially when insurers begin questioning what the deceased would have earned in the future.

Understanding Lost Income in a Vermont Wrongful Death Case

In Vermont, wrongful death law recognizes that when someone dies because of another party’s negligence or misconduct, surviving family members may recover economic damages tied to the financial support that person would have provided. Lost income is not limited to the final paycheck or last year of earnings. It includes the broader economic contribution the decedent would have made over their expected working life. This means wages, benefits, retirement contributions, and even the value of household services can be part of a Vermont wrongful death claim.

Under Vermont’s wrongful death framework, courts focus on pecuniary damages. These are measurable financial losses, not emotional harm. This distinction matters because insurers often attempt to narrow the scope of recoverable income by focusing only on recent earnings. Vermont law allows a wider lens when the evidence supports it, including projected future earnings and career growth, as recognized under Vermont Statutes Annotated Title 14 §§1491 and 1492

Who Can Recover Lost Income Under Vermont Law

Not every family member automatically qualifies to recover lost income damages. Vermont law generally allows recovery for those who were financially dependent on the deceased or who reasonably expected financial support. This often includes spouses and minor children, but it may also extend to other dependents based on the facts.

Courts evaluate dependency realistically. For example, a surviving spouse who shared household income and relied on the decedent’s wages for long-term stability may have a strong claim. A child who lost not only current support but future educational funding also falls within this analysis. Vermont courts do not require absolute dependence, but they do require credible evidence that financial contributions were real and ongoing.

What Counts as Lost Income in a Vermont Wrongful Death Claim

Lost income is broader than most families realize at first. It can include multiple categories of economic loss tied to the decedent’s working life and role within the household.

  • Regular wages or salary earned at the time of death
  • Overtime, commissions, and bonuses with a consistent history
  • Employer-provided benefits such as health insurance and retirement contributions
  • Future earning capacity based on career trajectory
  • The economic value of household services like childcare, home maintenance, or caregiving

Each of these elements must be supported by evidence. Vermont insurers routinely scrutinize claims that rely on assumptions rather than documentation, which is why thorough preparation matters.

Proving Past Earnings With Reliable Documentation

The starting point in most Vermont wrongful death income claims is establishing what the decedent was earning before their death. This typically involves employment records such as pay stubs, W-2 forms, and tax returns. These documents provide an objective snapshot of income history and are difficult for insurers to dispute.

Self-employed individuals or those with fluctuating income present a different challenge. In those cases, profit-and-loss statements, business tax filings, invoices, and bank records often become central evidence. Vermont courts recognize that income does not always arrive in neat, predictable paychecks. What matters is demonstrating a consistent pattern of earnings over time.

Establishing Future Earning Capacity in Vermont

Future income is where wrongful death cases often become contentious. Insurers argue that projections are speculative, while families know their loved one had years or decades of work ahead. Vermont law allows future earning capacity claims when supported by credible evidence and expert analysis.

This evaluation considers age, health, education, training, and work history. A young professional early in their career may have a stronger future earnings claim than their current salary alone would suggest. Conversely, someone nearing retirement may have a shorter earnings horizon, but still a valid claim for remaining working years and lost benefits.

The Role of Forensic Economists in Vermont Wrongful Death Claims

In many Vermont wrongful death cases, a forensic economist becomes essential. These experts analyze earnings history, employment trends, inflation, and life expectancy to calculate the present value of future lost income. Their work transforms raw data into a defensible financial model.

Forensic economists do not guess. They rely on labor statistics, career benchmarks, and actuarial tables. In Vermont courts, their testimony often carries significant weight, especially when insurers attempt to minimize losses or challenge projections. This expert analysis can be the difference between a partial settlement and full compensation for long-term financial harm.

How Vermont Comparative Negligence Can Affect Lost Income Recovery

Vermont follows a modified comparative negligence system. If the decedent is found partially at fault for the incident that caused their death, recoverable damages may be reduced proportionally. However, recovery is barred only if the decedent’s fault exceeds 50 percent.

This rule applies to lost income damages as well. For example, if a jury finds the decedent 20 percent at fault, the total lost income award would be reduced by that percentage. Understanding how fault is assessed is critical, because insurers often raise comparative negligence arguments to limit payouts.

Valuing Lost Benefits and Retirement Contributions

Income is not limited to take-home pay. Vermont wrongful death law allows recovery for lost employment benefits that had real economic value. Health insurance, employer retirement matches, stock options, and pension contributions are all part of a comprehensive income analysis.

These benefits are often overlooked early in a claim, but insurers are well aware of their value. Documenting benefit packages and employer contributions helps ensure the claim reflects the full scope of financial loss. Over a lifetime, lost retirement contributions alone can amount to hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Accounting for Household Services in Vermont Wrongful Death Cases

When a deceased family member provided essential household services, Vermont law allows those contributions to be valued economically. Childcare, elder care, cooking, cleaning, and home maintenance all have measurable market equivalents.

For instance, a parent who handled daily childcare saved the family significant expenses. After their death, surviving family members may need to pay for those services. Courts recognize this as a real financial loss tied directly to the wrongful death. Proper documentation and expert valuation are often required to support these claims.

Examples of How Lost Income Is Evaluated

Consider a Vermont construction worker in their early forties who earned a steady income with benefits and regularly worked overtime. Their wrongful death claim may include base wages, overtime averages, employer retirement contributions, and projected wage growth based on industry standards.

In another situation, a young professional with a graduate degree may have earned modest income at the time of death but had clear evidence of career advancement. Employment offers, performance reviews, and industry data can support a higher future earning capacity than current wages alone would suggest. These examples illustrate why lost income analysis must be individualized and grounded in evidence.

Common Challenges Families Face When Proving Lost Income

Insurers often argue that income projections are uncertain or inflated. They may challenge employment stability, future promotions, or the value of benefits. In Vermont, these disputes are resolved through evidence and expert testimony, not assumptions.

Families are sometimes unprepared for how aggressively insurers scrutinize financial records. Missing documentation or incomplete income histories can weaken a claim. This is why early legal guidance matters, especially when deadlines and evidentiary standards come into play.

Why Timing and Documentation Matter in Vermont Wrongful Death Claims

Vermont imposes a two-year statute of limitations on wrongful death actions. Delays can result in lost evidence, unavailable witnesses, or diminished credibility. Income documentation becomes harder to reconstruct over time, particularly for self-employed individuals or those with complex compensation structures.

Acting promptly allows attorneys to secure employment records, retain experts, and preserve evidence before it disappears. Vermont courts expect claims to be supported by clear, timely documentation, especially when significant future income is at stake.

Need Legal Help? Brandon J. Broderick, Attorney at Law is One Phone Call Away

If you are facing the financial uncertainty that follows the loss of a loved one, you do not have to navigate a Vermont wrongful death claim alone. Proving lost income requires careful documentation, expert analysis, and a clear understanding of Vermont wrongful death law. Brandon J. Broderick, Attorney at Law helps families pursue full and fair compensation for lost wages, benefits, and future earning capacity, while handling insurers who try to minimize these claims. If your family has lost essential financial support due to negligence, now is the time to protect your rights and your future.

Contact us today! 


This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult an attorney for advice regarding your specific situation.

Still have questions?

Speak to an attorney today

Call now and be done